Clint Eastwood is the story of three stories linked to the death ...
... converge at the end. Perhaps their being no more than a long introduction on the basis of the brief rendez-vous before the end credits, makes less impact than you have tried to show them. There's too much waiting, return to tell the characters and somehow generate the empathy needed to work the next steps, but in my opinion (opinion of man in the street) is not enough to keep alive the attention of the audience at all stages . That so rude: you do not understand (or try not to do it) wants to end up where and when you get there (when it is obvious), try the feeling of excess, in short, that it has taken too much. Of course there is no rebuttal, in the sense that we can not determine the validity of a different mount that is not there and maybe where you risk getting "quite ready and involved."
the whole work is fantastic, in my opinion not the best of Clint, but certainly if you look at the Oscar by mere composition and general operation of the whole film as an expressive medium. There are situations which by their simplicity even appear trivial, but behind a mastery in the story that elevates them to cult episodes, unique and unforgettable. Much work on the images and little text, so a lot of visual interpretation in both outgoing and incoming. A great performance from this point of view, literally because this is what he uses and what needs to be able to return (show) this is achieved in the success of the story.
The beauty of Eastwood in the role of director is that when you finish to see his film discover that it participated in something important, life had not spent unnecessarily. It is not mere entertainment act to "spend time" but a real task that requires the active participation of the spectator, and not just its presence as in most cases film. They are works that wind, you pull in the worlds that maybe, as in this case, are less successful than others, but always important and worthy to exist. Basta guardarsi in successione qualcuno dei film anoressici che girano casualmente in tv per percepire quanto รจ vasto il divario in termini di consistenza.
0 comments:
Post a Comment